Runechat and Runewealth same ownership or more involved than mentioned in the past

Discussion in 'Report A Scammer Archive' started by c0llin, Sep 4, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Runechat and Runewealth same ownership or more involved than mentioned in the past
  1. Unread #1 - Sep 4, 2018 at 3:10 AM
  2. c0llin
    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2015
    Posts:
    169
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    281
    Two Factor Authentication User

    c0llin Active Member
    $50 USD Donor New

    Runechat and Runewealth same ownership or more involved than mentioned in the past

    I am remaking this thread in a more organized fashion as requested by several staff members.
    This thread is a report on @aabbcathy @ youngwitty
    @ Runechat
    A few weeks ago I happened to be looking up the ip registrations on a few websites and happened to come across runechat and runewealth. To my surprise lynn the owner of runewealth is also listed as the owner of runechat. The two sites have always claimed their independence but it is becoming clearer this is not the case. As youngwitty and runechat are banned on sythe runewealth and runechat should not be able to operate on the site as other owners are not in good standing.
    As a runechat mod I had a much better idea of how the sites jointly operate and it was clear the two were connected. If I took more screen shots before I was wrongfully terminated I would have even more proof.
    These were the original urls i found the ip registrations on, since me posting the report they were both privated. One was even shows as the update being within hours of my report being posted. I had taken a few screenshots before they changed it to private.

    Screenshot - 671fd541d92ee2ec47291ea2908c6d30 - Gyazo
    Screenshot - 086971944f5e773645049efa21530da6 - Gyazo
    Screenshot - 2aa8e46de112598e5d29a20f85a6e883 - Gyazo

    When i saw these registrations with matching emails and most of the info i did a bit more digging to see if it could confirm a bit of my suspicions.
    [email protected] at Website Informer

    This site comes up with matching email for runewealth as listed in the domain
    https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=402834.0;wap email also links to this bitcoin forum posted by lynn.
    CEXIO的百度个人主页 also connects to this baidu account.

    These are the rules i believe they have broken

    I would like to add the rules that have I believe have been broken.

    • If an account is owned by a joint enterprise or company then all owners/directors/members of the company/enterprise must either have never owned a Sythe account, or have a Sythe account in good standing.
    • This rules would already disqualify a partnership of lynn having with runechat as runechat is banned on sythe and youngwitty doesnt have an account in good standing. youngwitty
    • Runechat

    The other rule is
    Businesses/Partnerships: Anyone running a business or partnered service implicitly agrees to share responsibility for the actions of their co-owners, as well as any workers they employ WHILE THE WORKER IS ON SHIFT AND ACTING ON BEHALF OF THE BUSINESS. Thus, if a partner or worker scams, all owners of the business will be banned until the debt is repaid. Workers, however, are not liable for anyone's actions but their own (although it is up to the staff to determine who falls into that category).

    Runechat and Runewealth are one tied by having the same domain, but also bye providing services for each other which forms a partnership which is absolutely undeniable.

    Runewealth workers get free mod on runechat.com they also help handle deposits and withdraws as well as they help moderate the chat, they also handle support tickets and sell excess gold that runechat.com has. If this is not defined as a partnership I don't know what is. It's also good to note runewealth also as a gold site exclusively is able to sell wallet to users on runechat which the only other people who are allowed to do this is other mods. Some of the Runewealth mods also act as House accounts on runechat where they bet money given to them with 0 risk of their own if they win or lose bets. I'd also like to say for someone to work on runewealth they are required to work on runechat. In no capacity have I seen someone work for runewealth without being on runechat too.
    As well as the current runewealth/runechat mod firestone was a house mod on runechat and then became a worker for runewealth after the runechat/runewealth worker padme left. The two are unquestionably connected at the core and should be treated this way.


    Some old cases on runewealth/runechat connections
    Reporting Runewealth Part 2


    Initial report in case a mod wanted to look at it. Reporting Lynn owner of runechat and runewealth
     
  3. Unread #2 - Sep 4, 2018 at 12:57 PM
  4. video
    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2007
    Posts:
    27,244
    Referrals:
    76
    Sythe Gold:
    1,028
    Vouch Thread:
    Click Here
    Discord Unique ID:
    178390610103894016
    Discord Username:
    video#0001
    In Memory of Jon Phanpy Donphan Rakashrug Gooby Detective Sythe's 10th Anniversary Valentine's Day 2015 Halloween 2015
    Christmas 2015 Easter 2016 (2) Paper Trading Competition Participant <3 n4n0 Verified Bronze Pokémon Trainer Nitro Booster (2) Verified Ironman Poképedia (2)
    Former OMM Extreme Homosex

    video Add video#0001 to sell gold or bitcoin many methods
    Sythe Veteran Knight video Donor Retired Administrator

    Runechat and Runewealth same ownership or more involved than mentioned in the past

    I remember at the time of these initial reports on runewealth/runechat it was deemed that evidence provided was insufficient. I would say that this further evidence is sufficient to prove joint ownership so runewealth now shares the same status as runechat on sythe and will have to resolve those issues to be allowed back
     
    ^ aabbcathy, OnlyPurples and Program like this.
< Tomworm scammer | Runewealth fake vouching/vouching for known scammer repeatedly >

Users viewing this thread
1 guest
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.


 
 
Adblock breaks this site