[Resolved]

I will try to keep this as straight forward as possible by breaking down each aspect of this report below;


15 compromised accounts:

@Clearly Killing It you mentioned in the original post on this report that the accounts were prior serviced by @Fur3oon Services:

This leads me back to my original stance on the accounts:

There were additional chatlogs between the two of you that were provided, in which @Fur3oon Services said something that could suggest that he did take ownership of one of the accounts in question:
"First, the account was taken as I replaced the account owner with the inferno and quiver"
However, this could be explained as "the account was taken" (the account was banned), and "as I replaced the account owner with the inferno and quiver" (he had to replace the customer's banned account that he ordered the inferno and quiver on by compensating him with the refund). This could also be taken at face value that @Fur3oon Services did in fact take ownership of the account, gave it to the customer, and this would explain why @Fur3oon Services is unable to produce a chatlog regarding the $273.10 USDT refund that he stated he issued to the customer. However, in the same chatlog @Fur3oon Services denies several times (before and after the above statement) having any involvement in the hijacking of the accounts, so I would not be able to explicitly say who attached an email on the account, and securing the account after the services were completed would have prevented this entire aspect of this report.


$580 in service fees:

This has been addressed in the points above. You confirmed several times that the accounts were prior serviced by @Fur3oon Services and given these statements, @Fur3oon Services will not be held liable for any supplies you provided or any service fees you paid.

$600 Deposit:

There is sufficient evidence that 450m 07 was refunded to the customer.
However, @Fur3oon Services if you are unable to provide any chatlogs of the customer agreeing to be refunded $273.10, this will not be included in the amount deemed to have been refunded.

$600 - $90 (450m 07 x .20/m) = $510.

I am going to base this part of the ruling on the most recent precedent regarding withholding a worker's deposit and the fact that there were no terms of service regarding this deposit; deposits are not meant to be used as profit.

@Fur3oon Services please refund @Clearly Killing It $510 of the deposit that was not used to reimburse the customer. You have been issued a DNT until this debt is repaid to @Clearly Killing It, as this is a significant amount of debt owed. I would strongly advise screen recording the refund and keeping the proper documentation of it to prevent any further issues here.

@Clearly Killing It you have also been issued a DNT for scamming, as per your own admission of utilizing bots to complete services on customer accounts, despite the customers being told the services would be done by hand. Please confirm here if/when you have received the refund.

 

@Fur3oon Services I see that you have edited your previous post and confirmed that the second set of 10 accounts were in fact not completed, and you are holding a payment of $240 and 200m 07, is this correct?

 

So the 10th account that was being serviced was the only account not completed and delivered to @Clearly Killing It when it was discovered that he was using bots to service customer accounts?

 

@Fur3oon Services can you please provide proof for this?

This could be screenshots of the accounts levels from the workers, payment receipts made to the workers, and ticket transcripts of the conversations regarding the workers being paid.

 

I was given access to the ticket "other-0028" which contained the transcript for the order of 10 level 3 accounts that were to be trained from 1-75 range and 1-70 magic.

@Clearly Killing It @Fur3oon Services - Please review the timeline and key points I have outlined below and let me know if everything is correct.


@Fur3oon Services quoted a price of $240 (150m per account, valued at .16/m)
@Clearly Killing It agreed and sent $240 BTC.

Spoiler

@Fur3oon Services deducted the payment for this service from @Clearly Killing It's wallet balance as he had not received the BTC payment at this point in time. Once the $240 BTC payment was received it should have brought @Clearly Killing It's wallet balance back to 3362m 07.

Spoiler

Six accounts were supplied with 20m 07 for bonds and supplies.

Spoiler

Three accounts were trained to 40 magic. The workers were informed at this point that the order was canceled due to @Fur3oon Services suspecting @Clearly Killing It to have been using bots to complete services on customer accounts on other tickets.

Spoiler

The remainder of the ticket is @Clearly Killing It and @Fur3oon Services, along with a couple of other workers going back and forth about @Clearly Killing It using bots to service customers' accounts.


Key points:

• @Clearly Killing It's wallet balance should be 3362m 07 (x.16/m = $537.92)
• After deducting what has been proven to have been refunded to the customer, @Clearly Killing It's deposit should be $510 ($600 - $90)
• 3/10 accounts were trained from 1-40 magic before the order was canceled

 

@Clearly Killing It

1. How many infernal cape/quiver/firecape services did you complete while working for @Fur3oon Services?
2. How much were you paid for each service you completed?
3. Why did you not mention anything about a wallet balance in your original report?
   

 

This was him adding 255m for both of the infernal capes you completed for the server?

 

So the wallet balance was essentially just your deposit then, correct?

$600 at the rate of .14/m = 4.285b